Every logo should be…

Twelve supposedly «universal» rules in brand identity design.

Norberto Chaves, author AuthorNorberto Chaves Followers: 3917

Cristian Petit De Murat, translator TranslationCristian Petit De Murat Followers: 20

Decades go by – almost a century – and in professional branding circles (not to mention academic circles) we keep hearing staggering claims, openly contradicted by the facts. In large sectors of the discipline, work keeps being ruled by hard-to-eradicate myths: preconceived ideas, by their own nature, don't listen to reason or fact. See here twelve classic examples of professional mythology:

  1. Every logo should refer to the organization activity or its product identity.
    FALSE: yes, in some instances; not, in an ample majority.

  2. Every logo should include a graphic symbol to complement its wordmark.
    FALSE: in some instances the symbol is essential; in others, superfluous; in a few, optional.

  3. Every logo should  be unique, not answering to conventional graphic codes.
    FALSE: in some instances the logo should be unique; in others, absolutely conventional.

  4. In every logo, the wordmark should  be manipulated, or the lettering or its correlation between them should be altered.
    FALSE: in some instances, transgression of typographic or calligraphic norm is helpful, and in others, harmful.

  5. Every logo should  be amiable, informal or colloquial.
    FALSE: only in some instances the informality of the logo can coincide with its best organization or product profile.

  6. Every logo should be modern, adjusting itself to contemporary graphic standards.
    FALSE: inherent to current «contemporary style» is its diversity; and some logos should be truly «classic» o, even «retro».

  7. Every logo should  adhere to the latest graphic trends.
    FALSE: only logos of ephemeral organizations could adhere to ephemeral languages: obsolescence is rarely beneficial.

  8. Every logo should  be «renewed» periodically.
    FALSE: its redesign can only be justified when low quality or a loss of competitiveness is detected.

  9. Every logo should  be «dynamic» or be designed to modify its form.
    FALSE: it only should be «declinable» when the diversity of activities calls for articulate sub-brands.

  10. Every logo should  adjust to the public profile.
    FALSE: The logo should reflect its owner's profile (the organization or the product) and their offering is what should be palatable for its targets.

  11. Every logo should  be «sales-inductive».
    FALSE: logos with advertising claim function can only be found in some impulsive buying instances.

  12. Every logo should  be simple and memorable.FALSE: in many cases it must be; when the demands of speed of reading and memorization are a priority. In other cases, such a requirement is superfluous.


Professional logo design is always specific, not subject to supposedly universal norms or prescriptions. It must be handled according to each case: it should detect the particular alternatives arising from the strategic profile and specific communication conditions. In all twelve preceding hypothesis, its falsehood comes from the word «every», that is, the presumption of universality to the respective norm.

What do you think? Share your comments right now!


QR code for access to article Every logo should be…

This article does not express the opinion of the editors and managers of FOROALFA, who assume no responsibility for its authorship and nature. To republish, except as specifically indicated, please request permission to author. Given the gratuity of this site and the hyper textual condition of the Web, we will be grateful if you avoid reproducing this article on other websites. Published on 09/08/2016

Download PDF

Main illustration of the article A “graphic Houdini”
A “graphic Houdini” The combined role of programmatic restrictions and creativity in the accomplishment of message effectiveness.


Your comment

Login with your account to comment on this article. If you do not have it, create your free account now.

Portrait of Viviana Reyes
Viviana Reyes
5 months ago

Exacto, cada logotipo que es realizado debe ser especifico así como mencionas, puesto que si nos basamos en las reglas universales, la marca no tendría una identidad clara, ya que cada diseño debe ir acorde a su necesidad estratégica y comunicacional, porque que sería de una marca si su logotipo esta hecho de una manera que no comunica lo que en realidad es. Esta no tendría ni una buena identidad ni imagen visual por parte del consumidor... Lo que si me queda en duda, es que ocurriría con los micro emprendedores que deciden lanzar una marca y diseñan particularmente su logo, en este ¿debería ir solo el isotipo o también podría ir el logotipo (texto) o ambos? 🙊

Portrait of Fabiccii Gg
Oct 2016

Muy buen artículo, sin embargo me genera dudas, cómo se aplica varios de los ejemplos dados a marcas nuevas. Por ejemplo una marca nueva basada en una tipografía simple, sin añadrle algún icono podría llamar la atención o destacar? Por otro lado, muchas de las marcas usadas de ejemplo, son marcas posicionadas y son muy exitosas, que pasa con marcas que intentan establecerse pero para eso deben pasar por varios rediseños, es esto algo erróneo?


Upcoming online seminars (in Spanish)

Refreshing courses to specialize with the best

Branding Corporativo

Branding Corporativo

Cómo planificar, construir y gestionar la marca de empresas e instituciones

20 hours (approx.)
1 diciembre

Auditoría de Marca

Auditoría de Marca

Taller de práctica profesional: análisis, diagnóstico y programa de marca sobre casos reales

30 hours (approx.)
1 enero